Comparison Between PHP Frameworks Codeigniter vs CakePHP vs Laravel

The market dominator, PHP dominating 80% of Internet market gave birth to several frameworks with various efficiency, functionality, security and ease of use, thereby, making it difficult for programmers to decide on which one to choose from the list of options available options for them at their disposal with almost same competency.

Let’s figure the pros and cons of 3 famous frameworks – CodeIgniter, Laravel and CakePHP. However, working your own solution by tweaking each one a bit is the best we recommend after all each framework are great in their own respect.

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CakePHP, Laravel and CodeIgniter

All frameworks accounts to one language – PHP. That makes it difficult for anyone to judge, and mostly because, everyone have their own set of preferences over one framework or the other. However, there are differences which we will try to highlight over our current writing.

CAKEPHP PHP Framework

CakePHP was the first one to come into existence for a regular workaround of PHP to make coding much simpler, efficient and secure, which was primarily focused on less coding and more output. That is exactly what CakePHP did! On top of that, CakePHP also played vital role in making it easier to extend core PHP libraries supporting more variants of features bundled into one.

Pros / Advantages of CakePHP:

1. CakePHP built on Object Relation Modal makes it easier to build SQL queries and fetch results on Server Side.
2. Offers bespoke Templates and great User Management features for scalability and fast coding.
3. Supports wide variety of Database and language options with dazzling file management capability.

Cons / Disadvantages of CakePHP:

1. Routing is one of a problem with CakePHP that requires one to configure default path for URLs.
2. CakePHP lacks in speed, as it is considered to be one of the slowest frameworks.
3. The documentation for CakePHP is overwhelming and needs a proper work to be done.

CODEIGNITER PHP Framework

CodeIgniter evolved a little later after CakePHP came into existence introducing Object Oriented Programming concept, thereby adding more efficiency into coding simplicity.

Pros / Advantages of CodeIgniter:

1. Effortless Active Record implementation and new functionality adding with easy handing and customization.
2. Presentation layer is smooth, lightweight and extensive with efficient debugging capabilities and comparatively fast in performance.
3. Supports various Relational Database Management features with smart Object Oriented Capabilities compatible with assortment of web servers and operative system.
4. CodeIgniter is free from complex development methodologies with astounding presentation and desires no standard coding rules. Completely straight forward solution.

Cons / Disadvantages of CodeIgniter:

1. Requires improvement in Documentation, but does offer excellently commented codes.
2. CodeIgniter is not a community driven and lacks support as being company-driven framework.
3. No built-in Object Relation Modal, thereby lacking some Oops capabilities.

LARAVEL PHP Framework

Laravel came much later after CakePHP and CodeIgniter did but has gained good market reputation over others. On top of that, Laravel keeps up with the modern development techniques and make it a cinch with vibrant community support.

Pros / Advantage of Laravel:

1. Laravel offers great community support and is considered to be one of the human logic frameworks in PHP.
2. Laravel is Robotic! Offers auto-loading feature which does not require manual inclusion and creates URL automatically based on path.
3. Exclusively packaged with features for easy addition to web productions simplifying things for programmer with modular packaging systems.
4. Easy customization to make coding much more stress-free coding functionality and elegant security.

Cons / Disadvantages of Laravel:

1. Too dependent on various other frameworks, mostly Symphony components. One needs to be familiar with 3^rd party products before using Laravel.
2. Laravel is seemly chaotic with a bundle of outnumbered features being used from 3^rd
3. Database functionality with Larval is limiting along with CRUD freezing at enterprise level.

Laravel is new and yet it requires to be messed around.

Henceforth, every platform enriches or lack features based on requirement and efficiency, but are also good for varying requirements and strategies. Stick on with the one that you defines your requirement at best, because at the end of they all are PHP.